1996 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1996Overall Score50.25/100
1996 Rover 400 vs 1996 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 400SpecificationFord Mondeo
RoverMakeFord
400ModelMondeo
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Rover 400SpecificationFord Mondeo
11,8 s0–100 km/h13,2 s
185 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
103 HPPower90 HP
127 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 400SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption—
5,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 400SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 400SpecificationFord Mondeo
4490 mmLength4556 mm
1695 mmWidth1751 mm
1390 mmHeight1427 mm
1120 KgWeight1371 Kg
2622 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Rover 400 and 1996 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…