1996 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 TD (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score49.25/100
1996 Ford Mondeo vs 1996 Rover 400 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Rover
400
Rover 400 1996Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 400
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 400
FordMakeRover
MondeoModel400
1996Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 400
13,2 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
180 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
90 HPPower103 HP
180 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
6,3 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 400
4556 mmLength4490 mm
1751 mmWidth1695 mm
1427 mmHeight1390 mm
1371 KgWeight1120 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2622 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Ford Mondeo and 1996 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 400 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…