DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Rover 400 vs 1998 Peugeot 406 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Peugeot 406

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakePeugeot
400Model406
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
4+1Seats4+1
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,0 s
0 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1800 ccEngine displacement1905 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque201 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption8,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4715 mm
—Width1760 mm
—Height1450 mm
—Wheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Rover 400 and 1998 Peugeot 406 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Peugeot 406 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…