DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Ford Focus vs 1998 Rover 400 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Focus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 400
FordMakeRover
FocusModel400
1998Model year1998
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats4+1
4Doors5

Performance

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 400
14,9 s0–100 km/h—
168 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1800 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
200 NmTorque0 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 400
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank0 lt
6,7 ltUrban consumption—
4 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 400
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
175/70 R14Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford FocusSpecificationRover 400
4362 mmLength—
1698 mmWidth—
1430 mmHeight—
1205 KgWeight—
2615 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Ford Focus and 1998 Rover 400 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Focus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…