DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Rover 25 vs 2005 Great Wall Deer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeGreat Wall
25ModelDeer
2005Model year2005
HatchbackBody typePick-up
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed140 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption11,8 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption14 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size215/75 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4870 mm
1688 mmWidth1750 mm
1419 mmHeight1800 mm
1130 KgWeight1575 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Rover 25 and 2005 Great Wall Deer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…