DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 Mazda 6 vs 2005 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
6Model25
2005Model year2005
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
10,9 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
190 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
121 HPPower101 HP
320 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank50 lt
7,6 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R15 HTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda 6SpecificationRover 25
4710 mmLength3990 mm
1780 mmWidth1688 mm
1480 mmHeight1419 mm
1520 KgWeight1130 Kg
2675 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 Mazda 6 and 2005 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…