DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Toyota Hiace vs 2002 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeRover
HiaceModel25
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower101 HP
167 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/85 S R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4615 mmLength3990 mm
1690 mmWidth1688 mm
1935 mmHeight1419 mm
—Weight1130 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Toyota Hiace and 2002 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…