DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2001 Rover 25 vs 2001 Saturn SL Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationSaturn SL
RoverMakeSaturn
25ModelSL
2001Model year2001
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationSaturn SL
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1901 cc
101 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationSaturn SL
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank46 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationSaturn SL
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationSaturn SL
3990 mmLength4524 mm
1688 mmWidth1687 mm
1419 mmHeight1397 mm
1130 KgWeight1058 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2601 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2001 Rover 25 and 2001 Saturn SL approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…