2001 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 (105 Hp) 2001Overall Score59.5/100
2001 Mazda Bongo vs 2001 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2001 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (101 Hp) 2001Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda BongoSpecificationRover 25
MazdaMakeRover
BongoModel25
2001Model year2001
MinivanBody typeHatchback
—Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Mazda BongoSpecificationRover 25
—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower101 HP
162 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda BongoSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption6,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,1 lt
—Average consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mazda BongoSpecificationRover 25
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/70 R15; 215/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Mazda BongoSpecificationRover 25
4585 mmLength3990 mm
1690 mmWidth1688 mm
1960 mmHeight1419 mm
—Weight1130 Kg
2920 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2001 Mazda Bongo and 2001 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…