2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Nissan Largo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Nissan
Largo
Nissan Largo 2.0 TDi (100 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Largo
RoverMakeNissan
25ModelLargo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Largo
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
101 HPPower100 HP
240 NmTorque177 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Largo
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,67 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Largo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Largo
3990 mmLength4610 mm
1688 mmWidth1745 mm
1419 mmHeight1905 mm
1130 KgWeight1620 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2735 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Nissan Largo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…