2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score60.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 2000 Mazda Bongo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
Bongo
Mazda Bongo 2.0 (105 Hp) 2000Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationMazda Bongo
RoverMakeMazda
25ModelBongo
2000Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats—
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationMazda Bongo
9,9 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower105 HP
240 NmTorque162 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationMazda Bongo
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank65 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,1 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationMazda Bongo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
175/65 R14 TTyre size195/70 R15; 215/65 R15
YesABS—
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationMazda Bongo
3990 mmLength4585 mm
1688 mmWidth1690 mm
1419 mmHeight1960 mm
1130 KgWeight—
2500 mmWheelbase2920 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 2000 Mazda Bongo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…