DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 25 vs 1999 Renault Megane Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeRenault
25ModelMegane
1999Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
101 HPPower109 HP
240 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
6,9 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3990 mmLength4028 mm
1688 mmWidth1698 mm
1419 mmHeight1368 mm
1130 KgWeight1155 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2468 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 25 and 1999 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…