DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Renault Megane vs 1999 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

58.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
MeganeModel25
1999Model year1999
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

9,7 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
200 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
109 HPPower101 HP
168 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption4,1 lt
8,4 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4028 mmLength3990 mm
1698 mmWidth1688 mm
1368 mmHeight1419 mm
1155 KgWeight1130 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Renault Megane and 1999 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…