DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Rover 25 vs 2004 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–58.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
RoverMakeVolvo
25ModelV50
2004Model year2004
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
7,8 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
145 HPPower136 HP
174 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,4 ltUrban consumption7,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/45 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationVolvo V50
3990 mmLength4522 mm
1688 mmWidth1845 mm
1417 mmHeight1457 mm
1090 KgWeight1472 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Rover 25 and 2004 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…