DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Land Rover Freelander vs 2004 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRover
FreelanderModel25
2004Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h7,8 s
160 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
117 HPPower145 HP
160 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption10,4 lt
8,1 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15 S; 215/75 R15Tyre size205/45 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4368 mmLength3990 mm
1809 mmWidth1688 mm
1708 mmHeight1417 mm
1510 KgWeight1090 Kg
2557 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Land Rover Freelander and 2004 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…