2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.6 i 16V (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Renault Megane Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Renault
Megane
Renault Megane 1.6i 16V (107 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
RoverMakeRenault
25ModelMegane
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats4
3/5Doors2
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
9,5 s0–100 km/h10,1 s
180 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower107 HP
138 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,4 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size185/55 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationRenault Megane
3990 mmLength4082 mm
1688 mmWidth1698 mm
1417 mmHeight1368 mm
1105 KgWeight1125 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2468 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Renault Megane approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…