DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Megane vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeRover
MeganeModel25
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h9,5 s
200 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1588 cc
107 HPPower109 HP
148 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,7 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15Tyre size175/65 R14T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4082 mmLength3990 mm
1698 mmWidth1688 mm
1368 mmHeight1417 mm
1125 KgWeight1105 Kg
2468 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Megane and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…