2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.6 i 16V (109 Hp) 2003Overall Score54.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Honda Civic Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Honda
Civic
Honda Civic 1.7 CTDI (99 Hp) 2003Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
RoverMakeHonda
25ModelCivic
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
9,5 s0–100 km/h11,2 s
180 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1588 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
109 HPPower99 HP
138 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,7 ltAverage consumption5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14TTyre size195/60 R15; 205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
3990 mmLength4140 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1440 mm
1105 KgWeight1265 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2575 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…