2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (84 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 1996 Nissan Sentra Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Nissan
Sentra
Nissan Sentra 1.4 (86 Hp) 1996Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Sentra
RoverMakeNissan
25ModelSentra
2000Model year1996
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Sentra
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,9 s
175 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1392 cc
84 HPPower86 HP
110 NmTorque114 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Sentra
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Sentra
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size155/80 R13 S
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Sentra
3990 mmLength4230 mm
1688 mmWidth1670 mm
1417 mmHeight1395 mm
1085 KgWeight960 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2430 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 1996 Nissan Sentra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…