1999 • Tofas
Sahin
Tofas Sahin 1.4 i PAW (82 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Tofas Sahin vs 2000 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (84 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Tofas SahinSpecificationRover 25
TofasMakeRover
SahinModel25
1999Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Tofas SahinSpecificationRover 25
13,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
162 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1372 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
82 HPPower84 HP
113 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Tofas SahinSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption8,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Tofas SahinSpecificationRover 25
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/80 R13 HTyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Tofas SahinSpecificationRover 25
4316 mmLength3990 mm
1642 mmWidth1688 mm
1437 mmHeight1417 mm
935 KgWeight1085 Kg
2490 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Tofas Sahin and 2000 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…