2000 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (84 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Rover 25 vs 1999 Nissan Almera Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Nissan
Almera
Nissan Almera 1.4 (87 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Almera
RoverMakeNissan
25ModelAlmera
2000Model year1999
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Almera
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
175 km/hTop speed172 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1392 cc
84 HPPower87 HP
110 NmTorque116 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Almera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Almera
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/70 R 13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationNissan Almera
3990 mmLength4320 mm
1688 mmWidth1690 mm
1417 mmHeight1395 mm
1085 KgWeight1070 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2535 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Rover 25 and 1999 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…