1999 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (84 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
1999 Rover 25 vs 2000 Tata Indica Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Tata
Indica
Tata Indica 1.4 i (85 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
WINNER
Tata Indica
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationTata Indica
RoverMakeTata
25ModelIndica
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationTata Indica
11,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
175 km/hTop speed160 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1405 cc
84 HPPower85 HP
110 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationTata Indica
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank37 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,4 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationTata Indica
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationTata Indica
3990 mmLength3660 mm
1688 mmWidth1625 mm
1417 mmHeight1485 mm
1085 KgWeight980 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Rover 25 and 2000 Tata Indica approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Tata Indica leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…