2000 • Nissan
Almera
Nissan Almera 1.4 (87 Hp) 2000Overall Score47.25/100
2000 Nissan Almera vs 1999 Rover 25 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.4 i 16V (84 Hp) 1999Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Almera
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationRover 25
NissanMakeRover
AlmeraModel25
2000Model year1999
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationRover 25
12,6 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
172 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1392 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
87 HPPower84 HP
116 NmTorque110 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationRover 25
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,2 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R 13Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan AlmeraSpecificationRover 25
4320 mmLength3990 mm
1690 mmWidth1688 mm
1395 mmHeight1417 mm
1070 KgWeight1085 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Almera and 1999 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…