DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1999 Rover 25 vs 2000 Honda Civic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Honda Civic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
RoverMakeHonda
25ModelCivic
1999Model year2000
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
11,8 s0–100 km/h13,3 s
175 km/hTop speed175 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
84 HPPower90 HP
110 NmTorque120 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
6,4 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationHonda Civic
3990 mmLength4325 mm
1688 mmWidth1695 mm
1417 mmHeight1390 mm
1085 KgWeight1180 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1999 Rover 25 and 2000 Honda Civic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Honda Civic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…