DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Opel Agila Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationOpel Agila
RoverMakeOpel
25ModelAgila
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats4
3/5Doors5

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationOpel Agila
10,2 s0–100 km/h15,0 s
180 km/hTop speed153 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1248 cc
103 HPPower70 HP
123 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationOpel Agila
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank41 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption6,6 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption5,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationOpel Agila
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size165/60 R14
YesABS—

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationOpel Agila
3990 mmLength3500 mm
1688 mmWidth1620 mm
1417 mmHeight1700 mm
1105 KgWeight1055 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2360 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Opel Agila approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…