DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Mini Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 25SpecificationMini Coupe
RoverMakeMini
25ModelCoupe
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

Rover 25SpecificationMini Coupe
10,2 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
180 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1364 cc
103 HPPower75 HP
123 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 25SpecificationMini Coupe
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,8 lt
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,6 ltAverage consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 25SpecificationMini Coupe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 25SpecificationMini Coupe
3990 mmLength3626 mm
1688 mmWidth1688 mm
1417 mmHeight1408 mm
1105 KgWeight1175 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2467 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Mini Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…