DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Lancia Ypsilon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RoverMakeLancia
25ModelYpsilon
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3

Performance

13,5 s0–100 km/h15,1 s
161 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1119 ccEngine displacement1251 cc
75 HPPower70 HP
95 NmTorque180 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3990 mmLength3778 mm
1688 mmWidth1705 mm
1417 mmHeight1530 mm
1020 KgWeight1045 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2388 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Lancia Ypsilon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…