DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Citroen C3 vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Citroen C3SpecificationRover 25
CitroenMakeRover
C3Model25
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Citroen C3SpecificationRover 25
15,4 s0–100 km/h13,5 s
165 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1398 ccEngine displacement1119 cc
68 HPPower75 HP
150 NmTorque95 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Citroen C3SpecificationRover 25
DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,1 ltUrban consumption8,8 lt
3,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
4,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Citroen C3SpecificationRover 25
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Citroen C3SpecificationRover 25
3850 mmLength3990 mm
1667 mmWidth1688 mm
1529 mmHeight1417 mm
1022 KgWeight1020 Kg
2460 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Citroen C3 and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…