2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 1.1 i 16V (75 Hp) 2003Overall Score47.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Citroen
C3
Citroen C3 1.4 HDi (68 Hp) 2003Overall Score46.25/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
47.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
RoverMakeCitroen
25ModelC3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
13,5 s0–100 km/h15,4 s
161 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1119 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
75 HPPower68 HP
95 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
8,8 ltUrban consumption5,1 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
—Average consumption4,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14Tyre size165/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationCitroen C3
3990 mmLength3850 mm
1688 mmWidth1667 mm
1417 mmHeight1529 mm
1020 KgWeight1022 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2460 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…