1998 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1998Overall Score58.5/100
1998 Rover 200 vs 1998 Land Rover Freelander Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1998 • Land Rover
Freelander
Land Rover Freelander 1.8 i 16V (120 Hp) 1998Overall Score58.25/100
WINNER
Rover 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 200SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
RoverMakeLand Rover
200ModelFreelander
1998Model year1998
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 200SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
7,5 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
204 km/hTop speed165 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
145 HPPower120 HP
174 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 200SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank59 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption13 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption9,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 200SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size195/80 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 200SpecificationLand Rover Freelander
3973 mmLength4382 mm
1688 mmWidth1805 mm
1419 mmHeight1760 mm
1135 KgWeight1380 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2560 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1998 Rover 200 and 1998 Land Rover Freelander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…