DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1998 Land Rover Freelander vs 1998 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Land RoverMakeRover
FreelanderModel200
1998Model year1998
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
165 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
120 HPPower145 HP
165 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank50 lt
13 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
9,8 ltAverage consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/80 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4382 mmLength3973 mm
1805 mmWidth1688 mm
1760 mmHeight1419 mm
1380 KgWeight1135 Kg
2560 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1998 Land Rover Freelander and 1998 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…