DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 Rover 200 vs 1995 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.5–58.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationBMW Z3
RoverMakeBMW
200ModelZ3
1995Model year1995
HatchbackBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
3/5Doors2

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationBMW Z3
7,5 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
204 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1798 cc
145 HPPower115 HP
174 NmTorque168 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationBMW Z3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank51 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,9 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationBMW Z3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/55 R15 VTyre size205/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationBMW Z3
3973 mmLength4025 mm
1688 mmWidth1692 mm
1419 mmHeight1288 mm
1135 KgWeight1160 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 Rover 200 and 1995 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…