DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1995 BMW Z3 vs 1995 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 200

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

58.25–58.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 200
BMWMakeRover
Z3Model200
1995Model year1995
CabrioletBody typeHatchback
2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 200
10,5 s0–100 km/h7,5 s
194 km/hTop speed204 km/h
1798 ccEngine displacement1796 cc
115 HPPower145 HP
168 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank50 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,9 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 200
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size185/55 R15 V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

BMW Z3SpecificationRover 200
4025 mmLength3973 mm
1692 mmWidth1688 mm
1288 mmHeight1419 mm
1160 KgWeight1135 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1995 BMW Z3 and 1995 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…