1993 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1993Overall Score50.25/100
1993 Rover 200 vs 1993 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 TD (88 Hp) 1993Overall Score49.25/100
WINNER
Rover 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 200SpecificationFord Mondeo
RoverMakeFord
200ModelMondeo
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5
Performance
Rover 200SpecificationFord Mondeo
11,5 s0–100 km/h13,7 s
182 km/hTop speed181 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
103 HPPower88 HP
127 NmTorque178 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 200SpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank61 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,3 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 200SpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 200SpecificationFord Mondeo
4220 mmLength4481 mm
1680 mmWidth1749 mm
1390 mmHeight1424 mm
1065 KgWeight1325 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2704 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Rover 200 and 1993 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…