1993 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 1.8 TD (88 Hp) 1993Overall Score49.25/100
1993 Ford Mondeo vs 1993 Rover 200 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1993 • Rover
200
Rover 200 1993Overall Score50.25/100
WINNER
Rover 200
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 200
FordMakeRover
MondeoModel200
1993Model year1993
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5
Performance
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 200
13,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
181 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1753 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
88 HPPower103 HP
178 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 200
DieselFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,1 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford MondeoSpecificationRover 200
4481 mmLength4220 mm
1749 mmWidth1680 mm
1424 mmHeight1390 mm
1325 KgWeight1065 Kg
2704 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1993 Ford Mondeo and 1993 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 200 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…