DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Rover 200 vs 1992 Audi 80 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 80
RoverMakeAudi
200Model80
1992Model year1992
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 80
11,5 s0–100 km/h14,1 s
182 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1396 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
103 HPPower70 HP
127 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank66 lt
8,9 ltUrban consumption9,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
7,2 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 80
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/65 R14 TTyre size175/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Rover 200SpecificationAudi 80
4220 mmLength4405 mm
1680 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1395 mm
1065 KgWeight1030 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Rover 200 and 1992 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…