DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Audi 80 vs 1992 Rover 200 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Audi 80

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
AudiMakeRover
80Model200
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
14,1 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
168 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1396 cc
70 HPPower103 HP
118 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
PetrolFuel typePetrol
66 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,9 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
5,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,5 lt
6,9 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/65 R14 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi 80SpecificationRover 200
4405 mmLength4220 mm
1695 mmWidth1680 mm
1395 mmHeight1390 mm
1030 KgWeight1065 Kg
2545 mmWheelbase2550 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Audi 80 and 1992 Rover 200 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Audi 80 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…