2003 • Rolls-Royce
Phantom
Rolls-Royce Phantom 6.75 i V12 48V (460 Hp) 2003Overall Score83.75/100
2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom vs 1999 Bentley Arnage Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1999 • Bentley
Arnage
Bentley Arnage 6.8 V8 (405 Hp) 1999Overall Score82.75/100
WINNER
Rolls-Royce Phantom
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
83.75–82.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rolls-Royce PhantomSpecificationBentley Arnage
Rolls-RoyceMakeBentley
PhantomModelArnage
2003Model year1999
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Rolls-Royce PhantomSpecificationBentley Arnage
5,9 s0–100 km/h6,0 s
240 km/hTop speed249 km/h
6749 ccEngine displacement6750 cc
460 HPPower405 HP
720 NmTorque830 Nm
12Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Rolls-Royce PhantomSpecificationBentley Arnage
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank100 lt
24,6 ltUrban consumption—
11,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
15,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rolls-Royce PhantomSpecificationBentley Arnage
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
—Tyre size255/50 R18W
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rolls-Royce PhantomSpecificationBentley Arnage
5834 mmLength5390 mm
1990 mmWidth1930 mm
1632 mmHeight1515 mm
2480 KgWeight2520 Kg
3570 mmWheelbase3116 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom and 1999 Bentley Arnage approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rolls-Royce Phantom leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VSComments are loading…