1999 • Bentley
Arnage
Bentley Arnage 6.8 V8 (405 Hp) 1999Overall Score82.75/100
1999 Bentley Arnage vs 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Rolls-Royce
Phantom
Rolls-Royce Phantom 6.75 i V12 48V (460 Hp) 2003Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Rolls-Royce Phantom
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
82.75–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Bentley ArnageSpecificationRolls-Royce Phantom
BentleyMakeRolls-Royce
ArnageModelPhantom
1999Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Bentley ArnageSpecificationRolls-Royce Phantom
6,0 s0–100 km/h5,9 s
249 km/hTop speed240 km/h
6750 ccEngine displacement6749 cc
405 HPPower460 HP
830 NmTorque720 Nm
8Cylinders12
Fuel & Consumption
Bentley ArnageSpecificationRolls-Royce Phantom
PetrolFuel typePetrol
100 ltFuel tank100 lt
—Urban consumption24,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,7 lt
—Average consumption15,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Bentley ArnageSpecificationRolls-Royce Phantom
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears6
255/50 R18WTyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Bentley ArnageSpecificationRolls-Royce Phantom
5390 mmLength5834 mm
1930 mmWidth1990 mm
1515 mmHeight1632 mm
2520 KgWeight2480 Kg
3116 mmWheelbase3570 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1999 Bentley Arnage and 2003 Rolls-Royce Phantom approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rolls-Royce Phantom leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…