DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Renault Twingo vs 2016 Ford Mondeo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Twingo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeFord
TwingoModelMondeo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

9,6 s0–100 km/h12,0 s
182 km/hTop speed200 km/h
898 ccEngine displacement998 cc
110 HPPower125 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
35 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,2 ltUrban consumption6,3 lt
5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,4 lt
5,7 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
185/45 R17 78H; 205/40 R17 80HTyre size215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3595 mmLength4871 mm
1646 mmWidth1852 mm
1554 mmHeight1482 mm
1001 KgWeight1455 Kg
2492 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Renault Twingo and 2016 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Twingo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…