DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Ford Mondeo vs 2016 Renault Twingo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Twingo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

FordMakeRenault
MondeoModelTwingo
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats4
5Doors3/5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
200 km/hTop speed182 km/h
998 ccEngine displacement898 cc
125 HPPower110 HP
170 NmTorque170 Nm
3Cylinders3

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
62 ltFuel tank35 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption7,2 lt
4,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5 lt
5,1 ltAverage consumption5,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
215/60 R16; 235/50 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19Tyre size185/45 R17 78H; 205/40 R17 80H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4871 mmLength3595 mm
1852 mmWidth1646 mm
1482 mmHeight1554 mm
1455 KgWeight1001 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2492 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Ford Mondeo and 2016 Renault Twingo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Twingo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…