DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Renault Trafic vs 2006 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
TraficModelAntara
2006Model year2006
MinivanBody typeSUV
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
163 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2463 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
135 HPPower150 HP
310 NmTorque220 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,3 ltUrban consumption13,3 lt
7,7 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4575 mm
1904 mmWidth1850 mm
1940 mmHeight1704 mm
1935 KgWeight—
3098 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Renault Trafic and 2006 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…