DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Opel Antara vs 2006 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeRenault
AntaraModelTrafic
2006Model year2006
SUVBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
175 km/hTop speed163 km/h
2405 ccEngine displacement2463 cc
150 HPPower135 HP
220 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank90 lt
13,3 ltUrban consumption10,3 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,7 lt
9,6 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
225/70 R16Tyre size195/65 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4575 mmLength4782 mm
1850 mmWidth1904 mm
1704 mmHeight1940 mm
—Weight1935 Kg
2707 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Opel Antara and 2006 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…