DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Renault Trafic vs 2013 Volvo V40 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volvo V40

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

58.5–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeVolvo
TraficModelV40
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeHatchback
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

15,1 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
160 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1596 cc
115 HPPower120 HP
300 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank62 lt
9,1 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,5 ltAverage consumption5,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
205/65 R16Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4369 mm
1904 mmWidth1783 mm
1940 mmHeight1420 mm
1785 KgWeight1463 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2647 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Renault Trafic and 2013 Volvo V40 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volvo V40 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…