DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Renault Trafic vs 2002 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeGAZ
TraficModel31
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeSedan
9Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h15,3 s
163 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2134 cc
120 HPPower114 HP
190 NmTorque255 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption—
8,6 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4897 mm
1904 mmWidth1840 mm
1940 mmHeight1472 mm
1775 KgWeight1550 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Renault Trafic and 2002 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…