DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Honda Sm-x vs 2002 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeRenault
Sm-xModelTrafic
2002Model year2002
MinivanBody typeMinivan
4Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

7,2 s0–100 km/h12,6 s
0 km/hTop speed163 km/h
1973 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
131 HPPower120 HP
186 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank90 lt
8,93 ltUrban consumption12,9 lt
5,43 ltExtra-urban consumption8,6 lt
—Average consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3950 mmLength4782 mm
1695 mmWidth1904 mm
1750 mmHeight1940 mm
1330 KgWeight1775 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Honda Sm-x and 2002 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…