DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Opel Meriva Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
TraficModelMeriva
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
138 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
190 NmTorque165 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank53 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,5 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size185/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4042 mm
1904 mmWidth1694 mm
1940 mmHeight1624 mm
1791 KgWeight1393 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2630 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Opel Meriva approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…