DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 Renault Trafic Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeRenault
CedricModelTrafic
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h14,9 s
157 km/hTop speed138 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
85 HPPower82 HP
170 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders—

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank90 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,8 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4782 mm
1695 mmWidth1904 mm
1445 mmHeight1940 mm
1480 KgWeight1791 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 Renault Trafic approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…