DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeOpel
TraficModelCombo
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeMinivan
9Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h15,5 s
138 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1686 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
190 NmTorque165 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
90 ltFuel tank52 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption6,9 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,9 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R16Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4320 mm
1904 mmWidth1685 mm
1940 mmHeight1800 mm
1791 KgWeight1260 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2751 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…