DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Renault Trafic vs 2003 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Trafic

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.5–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

RenaultMakeNissan
TraficModelCedric
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeSedan
9Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

14,9 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
138 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1870 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
82 HPPower85 HP
190 NmTorque170 Nm
—Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol / LPG
90 ltFuel tank0 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,8 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,7 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4782 mmLength4690 mm
1904 mmWidth1695 mm
1940 mmHeight1445 mm
1791 KgWeight1480 Kg
3098 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Renault Trafic and 2003 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Trafic leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…